64. Dillof A.M. Transferred Intent: An Inquiry into the Nature of Criminal Culpability // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 1998. Voll, № 2. P. 501–536.
65. Dine J, Gobert J. Cases and Materials on Criminal Law. 3>rd ed. L.: Blackstone Press Ltd., 2000. xxxiv [ii] p., 731 p.
66. Dubber M.D. Penal Panopticon: The Idea of a Modern Model Penal Code // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 53–100.
67. Edgar H. Mens Rea // Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice / Sanford H. Kadish, editor in chief. Vol. 1^1. Vol. 3. N.Y.: The Free Press A Division of Macmillan, Inc., 1983. P. 1028–1040.
68. Edgerton H.M. Negligence, Inadvertence, and Indifference; The Relation of Mental States to Negligence // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1926. Vol. 39, № 7. P. 849–870.
69. Edwards J.Ll.J. The Criminal Degrees of Knowledge // The Modern Law Review. L., 1954. Vol. 17, № 4. P. 294–314.
70. Emmer son D.McL. Case Notes, Director of Public Prosecutions v. Smith (Presumption of Intention) // Melbourne University Law Review. Melbourne, 1961. Vol. 3, № 1. P. 73–76.
71. Finkel N.J. Commonsense Justice, Culpability, and Punishment // HofstraLaw Review. Hempstead (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 669–705.
72. Fischer M. Note, The Human Rights Implications of a «Cultural Defense» // Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal. Los Angeles (Cal.), 1998. Vol. 6, № 3. P. 663–702.
73. Fitzgerald P.J. Crime, Sin and Negligence // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1963. Vol. 79, № 315. P. 351–370.
74. Fletcher G.P. Dogmas of the Model Penal Code // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 1998. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 3–24.
75. Fletcher G.P. Mistake in the Model Penal Code: A False False Problem / Symposium «The 25>th Anniversary of the Model Penal Code» /'/ Rutgers Law Journal. Camden (N.J.), 1988. Vol. 19, № 3. P. 649–670.
76. Fletcher G.P. Paradoxes in Legal Thought // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1985. Vol. 85, № 6. P. 1263–1292.
77. Fletcher G.P. The Fall and Rise of Criminal Theory // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 1998. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 275–294.
78. Fletcher G.P. The Right and the Reasonable // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1985. Vol. 98, № 5. P. 949–982.
79. Fletcher G.P. Two Kinds of Legal Rules: A Comparative Study of Burden-of-Persuasion in Criminal Cases // The Yale Law Journal. New Haven (Conn.), 1968. Vol. 77, № 5. P. 880–935.
80. Fletcher G.P. The Meaning of Innocence // The University of Toronto Law Journal. Toronto, 1998. Vol. 48, № 2. P. 157–174.
81. Foster M. A Report of Some Proceedings on Commission of Oyer and Terminer and Goal Delivery for the Trial of the Rebels in the Year 1746 in the County of Surry, and of other Crown Cases; To Which Are Added Discourses upon a Few Branches of the Crown Law. Oxford: Printed at the Clarendon Press; sold by M. Withers and T. Osborne; L.: Sold by J. Worrell and B. Tovey &c., 1762. [4] p., viiip., [4] p., 412
[20] p.
82. Friedman A.H. Note, Tison v. Arizona: The Death Penalty and the Non-Triggerman: The Scales of Justice Are Broken // Cornell Law Review. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1989. Vol. 75, № 1. P. 123–157.
83. Gainer R.L. The Culpability Provisions of the Model Penal Code / Symposium «The 25>th Anniversary of the Model Penal Code» // Rutgers Law Journal Camden (N.J.), 1988. Vol. 19, № 3. P. 575–591.
84. Genestal R. Les origines du privilege clerical // Nouvelle Revue historique de droit frangais et etranger. P., 1908. 32>е аппёе. P. 161–212.
85. Gerber R.J. On Dispensing Injustice // Arizona Law Review. Tucson (Ariz.), 2001. Vol. 43, № 1. P. 135–173.
86. Gerber R.J. The Felony Murder Rule: Conundrum Without Principle // Arizona State Law Journal. Tempe (Ariz.), 1999. Vol. 31, № 3. P. 763–785.
87. Givelber D. The New Law of Murder // Indiana Law Journal. Bloomington, 1994. Vol. 69, № 2. P. 375–423.
88. Goff R. The Mental Element in the Crime of Murder // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1988. Vol. 104, № 1. P. 30–59.
89. Goodhart A.L. The Shaw Case: The Law and Public Morals // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1961. Vol. 77, № 308. P. 560–568.
