Ford R. Q. The Parables ofJesus. Recovering the Art of Listening. Minneapolis, 1997.
France R. T. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids; Cambridge, 2007.
Frenschkowski M. Traum and Traumdeutung in Matthausevangelium: Einige Beobachten //Jahrbuch fur Antike und Christentum 41 (1998). S. 5-47.
Funk R. W., Hoover R. W. (ed.). The Five Gospels: The Search of Authentic Words ofJesus. Sonoma; New York, 1993.
Funk R. W., Scott B. B., Butts J. R. The Parables of Jesus. Red Letter Edition. The Jesus Seminar. Sonoma, California, 1988.
Gager J. G. The Origins of Anti-Semitism. Oxford, 1983.
Gale A. M. Redefining Ancient Borders. The Jewish Scribal Framework of Matthew’s Gospel. New York; London, 2005.
Gnilka J. Das Matthausevangelium. Bd. I–II. Freiburg, 1992.
Goodacre M. Thomas and the Gospels. The Making of an Apocryphal Text. Grand Rapids, 2012.
Grassi J. A. The Secret Identity of the Beloved Disciple. New York, 1992.
Goodacre M. Thomas and the Gospels. The Making of an Apocryphal Text. Grand Rapids, 2012.
Gray T. C. The Temple in the Gospel of Mark. A Study in Its Narrative Role. Grand Rapids, 2010.
Green J. B. The Gospel of Luke. Grand Rapids; Cambridge, 1997.
Gundry R. H. Matthew. A Commentary on His Literary and Theological Art. Grand Rapids, 1982.
Gundry R. H. The Use of the Old Testament in St. Matthew’s Gospel: With Special Reference to the Messianic Hope. Leiden, 1975.
Hare D. R. A. The Theme of Jewish Persecution of Christians in the Gospel According to St. Matthew. Cambridge, 1967.
Haren M. J. The Naked Young Man: A Historian’s Hypothesis on Mark 14, 51–52 // Biblica 84 (2003). P. 525–531.
Harrington J. M. The Lukan Passion Narrative. The Markan Material in Luke 22,54–23,25. A Historical Survey: 1891–1997. Leiden; Boston; Koln, 2000.
Haufe G. Παραβολή. – EDNT 3, 12–16.
Head P. M. Christology and the Synoptic Problem. An Argument for Markan Priority. Cambridge, 1997.
Heil J. P. The Transfiguration of Jesus: Narrative Meaning and Function of Mark 9:2–8, Matt 17:1–8 and Luke 9:28–36. Roma. 2009.
Hendriksen W. Exposition of the Gospel According to St. Matthew. Grand Rapids, 1973.
Hengel M. Crucifixion. Philadelphia, 1977.
Herzog W. R. Parables as Subversive Speech: Jesus as Pedagogue of the Oppressed. Louisville, 1994.
Holmas G. O. Prayer and Vindication in Luke-Acts. The Theme of Prayer within the Context of Legitimating and Edifying Objective of the Lukan Narrative. New York, 2011.
Hooker M. D. Isaiah in Mark’s Gospel // Isaiah in the New Testament / Ed. by
S. Moyise and M. J. J. Menken. London; New York, 2005. P. 35–49.
Hooker M. D. The Gospel according to Saint Mark. Grand Rapids; London, 1991.
Hopf Ch. Chroniques greco-romaines inedites ou peu connues. Paris, 1873.
Howard Marshall I. Last Supper and Lord’s Supper. Paternoster, 2005.
Hultgren A. The Parables ofJesus. A Commentary. Grand Rapids; Cambridge, 2000.
Hunter A. M. Interpreting the Parables. London-Philadelphia, 1980.
Jackson H. M. Why the Youth Shed His Cloak and Fled Naked: The Meaning and Purpose of Mark 14:51–52. // Journal of Biblical Literature 116 (1997). P. 273–289.
Jeremias J. The Eucharistic Words ofJesus. London, 1966.
Jeremias J. Palastinakundliches zum Gleichnis vom Saemann (Mark IV.3–8 par.). // New Testament Studies 13, 1966–1967. P. 48–53.
Jeremias J. The Parables ofJesus. London, 1972.
Jones I. H. The Matthean Parables. A Literary and Historical Commentary. Leiden; New York; Koln, 1995.
Jones P. R. The Teaching of the Parables. Nashville, 1984.
Julicher A. Die Gleichnisreden Jesu. Bd. 1–2. Freiburg, 1888–1889.
Kasper W. Foreword // Christ Jesus and the Jewish People Today: New Explorations of Theological Interrelationships / Ed. by Ph. A. Cunningham, J. Sievers, M. Boys, H. H. Hendrix. Grand Rapids, 2011. P. X–XVIII.
Kee H. C. Jesus: Glutton and Drunkard // Chilton B., Evans C. A. (ed.). Authenticating the Words ofJesus. Boston; Leiden, 2022. P. 311–332.
Keener C. S. The Gospel of Matthew. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids; Cambridge, 2009.
Keith G. Hated Without a Cause? A Survey ofAnti-Semitism. Carlisle, 1997.
